ABSTRACT
Objective: To estimate the direct costs of hospital care according to coinfection in adult COVID-19 patients. Material(s) and Method(s): A retrospective follow-up study of adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March and August 2020 at the San Vicente Foundation Hospitals (Medellin and Rionegro, Colombia). Patients whose diagnosis of SARS-Cov2 pneumonia was confirmed by RT-PCR test were included. Death from any cause and length of stay were considered outcome variables. Costs were estimated in 20 20 US dollars. Result(s): 365 patients with an average age of 60 years (IQR: 46-71), 40% female, were analyzed. 60.5% required an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). All-cause mortality was 2.87 per 100 patient-days. Patients admitted to the ICU who developed coinfection had an average length of stay of 27.8 days (SD:17.1) and an average cost of $23,935.7 (SD: $16,808.2);patients admitted to the ICU who did not develop a coinfection had an average length of stay of 14.7 days (SD:8.6) and an average cost of $9,968.5 (SD: $8,054.0). Conclusion(s): A high percentage of patients required intensive care, and there was a high mortality due to COVID-19. In addition, a higher cost of care was observed for those patients who developed coinfection and were admitted to ICU.Copyright © 2023 Asociacion Colombiana de Infectologia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID pneumonia can lead to pneumomediastinum or pneumothorax during non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation. This affects the prognosis. Methodology: During the study period, 121 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections and invasive or non-invasive ventilation therapy were recorded in our hospital. All patients with a pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum were analyzed in more detail. Result(s): Pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum occurred in 12 patients and resulted in 7 deaths. Discussion(s): The incidence of pneumothorax with COVID infection ranges from 0.56 to 1%, reaching 3.5% in our own studies and 4.2% under invasive mechanical ventilation. The incidence of pneumomediastinum was 10% and 9.2% in our own patients. Overall mortality was 58.3% and similar to that reported in the literature, up to 60%.Copyright © 2023 Dustri-Verlag Dr. K. Feistle.
ABSTRACT
Background: Managing patients with cancer during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been challenging. Disruptions in cancer management have been observed due to cancellation of treatment, issues related to commuting, and dearth of health-care workers. Objective(s): This study was conducted during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and was aimed at evaluating the 30-day all-cause mortality among patients with cancer and COVID-19 infection and the factors affecting it. Material(s) and Method(s): In this retrospective study, we collected secondary data from nine tertiary care centers in South India over a period of 10 months from March to Dec 2020. Patients across all age groups with histopathologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer who were affected by COVID-19 during their evaluation or treatment were included in the study. The primary outcome variables of the present study were 30-day all-cause mortality, cancer outcomes, and COVID-19 outcomes. Result(s): A total of 206 patients were included. Median age of the cohort was 55.5 years, and the male-To-female ratio was 1:1.03. The 30-day mortality rate was 12.6%. Twenty-Two patients (10.7%) had severe COVID-19 infection at the initial presentation. Predictors for severe pneumonia at the initial presentation were incomplete remission at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis and palliative intent of treatment. Severe pneumonia at the initial presentation, diagnosis of COVID-19 on or before August 2020, and need for ventilator support were associated with increased mortality. Conclusion(s): Severity of infection at the initial presentation, cancer status, and the intent of cancer treatment impact COVID-19 outcomes in patients with cancer.Copyright © 2022 Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The Covid-19 pandemic has led to an uncomfortable and often recurrent situation in foot care services in the UK which frequently manifests in the older, White British, overweight, lone male population who often are manual workers. Result(s): These patients are unaware of local or national health promotion campaigns (e.g. iDEAL group's ACT NOW campaign, Diabetes UK's Putting Feet First) so have little awareness and education regarding potential foot problems. They are not aware of 5-to drive, eat 5 portions of fruit and vegetables a day, check your feet every day or walk 10,000 steps initiatives. They do not access public health materials and do not follow social media platforms, magazines, or newspapers. Therefore when they present in clinic, often after an emergency appointment with their GP, or an attendance at A&E, they present with significant soft tissue damage or systemic infection, frequently catastrophic tissue loss and serious co-morbidity (often in the form of renal or cardiac failure). Many require immediate hospital admission, intra-venous antibiotics, surgical debridement, vascular intervention and/or amputation. Unfortunately for some early mortality (often from an overwhelming cardio-vascular event) is the reality before they get as far as a major amputation. Discussion(s): Patients with more long-term conditions have increased risk of missing GP appointments (after controlling for number of appointments made) and are at increased risk of all-cause mortality, with those with long-term mental-health conditions who miss >2 appointments per year having >8x risk of all-cause mortality compared with those similar diagnoses who missed no appointments (McQueenie et al. 2019).
ABSTRACT
Background: Since 1990, the maternal mortality significantly decreased at global scale as well as the North Africa and Middle East. However, estimates for mortality and morbidity by cause and age at national scale in this region are not available. Method(s): This study is part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors study (GBD) 2019. Here we report maternal mortality and morbidity by age and cause across 21 countries in the region from 1990 to 2019. Result(s): Between 1990 and 2019, maternal mortality ratio (MMR) dropped from 148.8 (129.6-171.2) to 94.3 (73.4-121.1) per 100 000 live births in North Africa and Middle East. In 1990, MMR ranged from 6.0 (5.3-6.8) in Kuwait to 502.9 (375.2-655.3) per 100 000 live births in Afghanistan. Respective figures for 2019 were 5.1 (4.0-6.4) in Kuwait to 269.9 (195.8-368.6) in Afghanistan. Percentages of deaths under 25 years was 26.0% in 1990 and 23.8% in 2019. Maternal hemorrhage, indirect maternal deaths, and other maternal disorders rank 1st to 3rd in the entire region. Ultimately, there was an evident decrease in MMR along with increase in socio-demographic index from 1990 to 2019 in all countries in the region and an evident convergence across nations. Conclusion(s): MMR has significantly declined in the region since 1990 and only five countries (Afghanistan, Sudan, Yemen, Morocco, and Algeria) out of 21 nations didn't achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) target of 70 deaths per 100 000 live births in 2019. Despite the convergence in trends, there are still disparities across countries.Copyright © 2022 Academy of Medical Sciences of I.R. Iran. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: This study assessed the real-world burden of COVID-19 infection in African Union (AU) member states during the first 12 months of the pandemic using selected epidemiological measures. Method(s): Data were sourced from the African CDC and Our World in Data,for time period spanning February 2020 to January 2021. AU member states were classified into low, medium and high burden based on COVID-19 morbidity. We conducted descriptive and inferential analyses of the following epidemiological measures: morbidity and mortality rates (MMRs), case fatality rate (CFR), and case ratios. Result(s): A total of 3.2 million COVID-19 cases were reported during the first 12 months, with 2.6 million recoveries, 536,784 cases remaining active, and 77, 486 deaths. Most countries in AU experienced low burden of COVID-19 (49.1%, n=26) compared to 28.3% (n=15) with medium and 22.6% (n=12) with high burden of the disease. South Africa recorded the highest number of cases (1.31 million) followed by Morocco with 457,625 and Tunisia with 175,065 cases. Correspondently, death tolls for these countries were 36,467, 7,888 and 5,528 deaths, respectively. Of the total COVID-19 tests performed (83.8 million) during the first 12 months, 62.43% were from high burden countries. The least testing occurred in the medium burden (18.42%) countries. The overall CFR of AU was 2.21%. Morbidity rate of 327.52/105 population and mortality rate of 5.96/105 population were recorded during the period with significant (p<0.0001) variations across burden levels and regions. Continental morbidity and mortality rates of 17,359/105 population and 315.933/105 population were recorded with significant correlation (r=0.863, p<0.0001) between them and variations across selected epidemiological measures by COVID-19 burden levels. Conclusion(s): Understanding the true burden of the disease in AU countries is important for establishing the impact of the pandemic in the African continent and for intervention planning and deployment of resources including vaccines.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Objective: To determine the frequency of antibiotic use and to know which clinical and socio-demographic variables were related to the probability of suffering infections associated with COVID-19. Method(s): Adults hospitalized for COVID-19 who received one or more antibiotics during hospitalization were evaluated. We performed a descriptive analysis of variables in the general population' bivariate analysis in two groups (documented vs. suspected infection) and multivariate logistic regression of factors associated with mortality. Result(s): It was determined that 60.4% of adults hospitalized for COVID-19 received antibiotics. Coinfection was documented in 6.2% and superinfection in 23.3%. Gram-negative germs were reported in 75.8% of cultures, fungi in 17.8% and gram-positive in 14.2%. Variables such as age, comorbidities, ICU, anemia, steroids, mechanical ventilation, hemofiltration were statistically significantly related to documented infection. High-flow cannula was associated as a protective factor. Overall mortality was 43.9%, 57.8% in the first group and 38.1% in the second (p=0.002). Conclusion(s): There is a considerable frequency of antibiotic use in subjects hospitalized for COVID-19, particularly related to relevant findings of bacterial superinfection, in those with comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, anemia and fragility, in whom the behavior of the disease is more severe and lethal.Copyright © 2023 Asociacion Colombiana de Infectologia. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Cancer remains one of the most prevalent diseases in the United States and a leading cause of death. Large prospective studies have found significant correlations between dietary intake and cancer. Chronic inflammation promotes pro-cancer inflammatory environments and nutrition can influence inflammation, with the intake of certain food items increasing inflammatory biomarkers. The objective of this research was to explore the relationship between inflammatory diet score measured by the Dietary Inflammatory index and all-cause mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and cancer recurrence among cancer survivors. Web of Science, Medline, CINHAL, and PsycINFO databases were searched to collect potentially eligible sources that focus on dietary inflammation and cancer outcomes. All sources were uploaded to Covidence software and screened by two independent blinded reviewers. The quality of the sources was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale and relevant data was extracted and transferred to the Comprehensive Meta Analysis software and a random effects model was used to perform meta-analysis. Of the 1444 studies imported into the Covidence software, 13 passed all the screening stages and were included in the final analysis. Eight studies reported on pre-diagnosis diet while five others reported on postdiagnosis diet. Five studies reported on colorectal cancer, four on breast cancer, two on ovarian cancer, one on endometrial cancer and one on prostate cancer. Meta-analysis of the studies found that being in the highest postdiagnosis DII score indicating pro-inflammatory diet significantly increased the risk of all-cause death among cancer survivors by 33.5% (HR = 1.335, 95% CI = 1.049, 1.698, n = 6). Analysis did not show a statistically significant association between DII score and cancer mortality or recurrence (HR = 1.097, 95% CI = 0.939, 1.281, n = 6). Analysis by cancer subtype found a significant correlation between postdiagnosis DII score and all-cause mortality among the breast cancer survivors (HR = 1.335, 95% CI = 1.041, 1.711, n = 3) though there were no significant associations between DII and the outcomes of interest from the other cancer types. The meta-analysis concludes that being in the highest postdiagnosis DII score group significantly increased the risk of all-cause death among cancer survivors. This suggests that risk of all-cause mortality could be reduced for cancer survivors by consuming more anti-inflammatory food components and reducing consumption of pro-inflammatory foods. These findings also warrant more research in this field to clarify the relationship between dietary inflammation as measured by the DII and cancer outcomes, particularly cancer-specific mortality.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic in March 2020. Multiple COVID-19 waves are putting tremendous stress on healthcare systems. Evidence showed that high-flow nasal canula (HFNC) reduced the need for mechanical ventilation and shortened the time to clinical recovery among patients with severe COVID-19. This study aimed to assess the effect of using HFNC compared to non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), on adult patients with COVID-19. Method(s): This retrospective study included patients hospitalized due to COVID-19 between October 2020 to December 2021 with appropriate ICD-10 diagnosis recorded in a commercially available, all-payer administrative database across 300+ hospitals. The identified patients were divided in two cohorts, one being the patients treated with HFNC as the first line respiratory support and another with NIV. Outcomes included all-cause mortality rate and length of stay. Multivariable analyses were performed to adjust for baseline characteristics. Result(s): Out of 16,534 eligible patients, 4,334 patients received HFNC as the first line respiratory support, whereas 12,200 received NIV. The all-cause mortality rate was 20.24% and 37.14% in the HFNC and NIV group, respectively. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, the all-cause mortality rate in the HFNC group was lower compared to NIV (odds ratio [OR], 0.51;95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.55;p<0.001). The total length of stay was around 15 days for all patients. No different was observed between groups ( mean difference 0.3 days;95% CI, -0.27 - 0.92 days;p>0.05). Conclusion(s): Patients treated with HFNC showed lower mortality rates compared to NIV for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, further studies are still needed to better elucidate the clinical and economic benefit of HFNC in COVID-19 patients.Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in the United States. Concomitant Covid-19 infection and the outcomes of AF are unknown. Objective(s): The study's goals were to analyze the outcomes of AF during the Covid-19 pandemic. Method(s): We conducted a retrospective cohort study based on the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) of Adults (>18 years) hospitalized for AF as the primary admitting diagnosis based on the ICD-10 codes and stratified these groups into concomitant covid-19 infection vs. non-covid-19 infection. All-cause mortality was our primary outcome, while the rate of ICU admission, length of stay, hospital charges were our secondary outcomes. Temporal trends were assessed using logistic regression. Result(s): In 2020, there were 1,994,985 admissions for atrial fibrillation, out of whom 104,495 (5.3%) had concomitant Covid-19. In the 104,495 AF admissions with covid-19, the mean age was 75y and 56.8% were males. Our results, image 1, showed AF with and without concomitant Covid-19 had similar rates of comorbid conditions including HTN, DM, OSA, CAD. HFrEF, and ESRD. AF patients with Covid-19 infection had a lower prevalence of smoking (31.83% vs. 39.4%, p<.001) and alcohol use (2% vs. 4.2%, p<.001). AF patients from both groups had similar rates of stroke (1.6% vs. 1.0%, p<.001). New AF patients with concomitant Covid-19 had worsening in-hospital outcomes such as shock (12.8% vs. 3.7%, p<.001), admission to the ICU (18.1% vs. 6.4%, p<0.001), higher all-cause mortality (21.8% vs. 3.9%, p<0.001), a longer length of stay (9.96 days vs 6.08 days, p<.001), and total hospital costs ($114,387 vs. $85,830, p<.0001). The incidence of AF catheter ablation on initial hospital admission for AF Covid-19 was lower compared to the AF non-covid-19 patients (.08% vs. 1.39%, p<.001). Conclusion(s): In 2020, Covid-19 infection was an independent predictor of higher all-cause mortality, length of stay, and costs in patients admitted for atrial fibrillation. In addition, these patients were less likely to get catheter ablation on hospital admission. [Formula presented]Copyright © 2023
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) caused by SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) has caused a global health crisis. Initially considered a respiratory tract pathogen, it can cause multiple organ dysfunction. It has also been described to predispose to venous and arterial thromboembolism;however, limited published data is available regarding mesenteric thrombosis COVID-19. Clinicians should be aware of the life-threatening situation in COVID-19 patients. Method(s): A case series analysis of 9 patients admitted and managed under department of operation over a duration of 13 months from September 2020 to September 2021 Results: Out of the total of 9 cases of intestinal ischemia, 3 were COVID-19 positive (rapid antigen, RT PCR or CORADS 4 or higher), overall mortality being 55.5% and patients with COVID- 19 were found to have 100% mortality in the study. Mortality in conservatively managed patients was 100%, Mortality in surgically managed patients was 42.8%. Pre operative acidosis, hypoxia and hypotension were found to be important determinants of outcome of the disease. Conclusion(s): Treatment of COVID - 19 and intestinal Ischemia should go simultaneously and in line with the latest evidence based guidelines of COVID 19, Patients who survive an acute event are likely to die of other complications related to the COVID-19 like ARDS, Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation etc that could have predisposed them to intestinal ischemia. Perioperative acidosis, hypoxia and hypotension are important determinants of the outcome of the course of the disease.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 causes significant morbidity and mortality, albeit with considerable heterogeneity among affected individuals. It remains unclear which host factors determine disease severity and survival. Given the propensity of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) to promote inflammation in healthy individuals, we investigated its effect on COVID-19 outcomes. Method(s): We performed a multi-omics interrogation of the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, and proteome of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from COVID-19 patients (n=227). We obtained clinical data, laboratory studies, and survival outcomes. We determined CH status and TET2-related DNA methylation. We performed single-cell proteogenomics to understand clonal composition in relation to cell phenotype. We interrogated single-cell gene expression in isolation and in conjunction with DNA accessibility. We integrated these multi-omics data to understand the effect of CH on clonal composition, gene expression, methylation of cis-regulatory elements, and lineage commitment in COVID-19 patients. We performed shRNA knockdowns to validate the effect of one candidate transcription factor in myeloid cell lines. Result(s): The presence of CH was strongly associated with COVID-19 severity and all-cause mortality, independent of age (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.45-8.36, p=0.005). Differential methylation of promoters and enhancers was prevalent in TET2-mutant, but not DNMT3A-mutant CH. TET2- mutant CH was associated with enhanced classical/intermediate monocytosis and single-cell proteogenomics confirmed an enrichment of TET2 mutations in these cell types. We identified celltype specific gene expression changes associated with TET2 mutations in 102,072 single cells (n=34). Single-cell RNA-seq confirmed the skewing of hematopoiesis towards classical and intermediate monocytes and demonstrated the downregulation of EGR1 (a transcription factor important for monocyte differentiation) along with up-regulation of the lncRNA MALAT1 in monocytes. Combined scRNA-/scATAC-seq in 43,160 single cells (n=18) confirmed the skewing of hematopoiesis and up-regulation of MALAT1 in monocytes along with decreased accessibility of EGR1 motifs in known cis-regulatory elements. Using myeloid cell lines for functional validation, shRNA knockdowns of EGR1 confirmed the up-regulation of MALAT1 (in comparison to wildtype controls). Conclusion(s): CH is an independent prognostic factor in COVID-19 and skews hematopoiesis towards monocytosis. TET2-mutant CH is characterized by differential methylation and accessibility of enhancers binding myeloid transcriptions factors including EGR1. The ensuing loss of EGR1 expression in monocytes causes MALAT1 overexpression, a factor known to promote monocyte differentiation and inflammation. These data provide a mechanistic insight to the adverse prognostic impact of CH in COVID-19.
ABSTRACT
Aim: To evaluate the clinical characteristics, severity, and outcomes of local COVID-19 patients with diabetes. Study Design: Case series Place and duration of study: Orthopedic Medical Institute Hospital, Karachi from 1st September 2020 to 28th February 2021. Method(s): One hundred and forty seven COVID-19 positive patients with diabetes and pre-diabetes were enrolled. The patients' demographic and clinical information specific to COVID-19 and diabetes was collected and analyzed. Result(s): The mean age of 64.03+/-11.56 years. The ischemic heart disease (39.9%) and hypertension (74.3%) were the two most prevalent comorbid conditions. The overall mortality rate of 20.3%. Between patients with diabetes receiving steroids and those receiving no steroids, the mean fasting (FBG) and random blood glucose (RBG) were relatively elevated. Glycemic control had no discernible impact on the severity, results, or length of the COVID-19 hospital stay (p>0.05). Conclusion(s): No significant effect of diabetes millitus control on COVID severity and outcomes, but the altered blood glucose levels suggest a need to define specific targeted intervention for COVID-19 patients with comorbidities, specifically diabetes mellitus.Copyright © 2023 Lahore Medical And Dental College. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mortality, this study investigates overall, sex- and age-specific excess all-cause mortality in 20 countries, during 2020. METHODS: Total, sex- and age-specific weekly all-cause mortality for 2015-2020 was collected from national vital statistics databases. Excess mortality for 2020 was calculated by comparing weekly 2020 observed mortality against expected mortality, estimated from historical data (2015-2019) accounting for seasonality, long- and short-term trends. Crude and age-standardized rates were analysed for total and sex-specific mortality. RESULTS: Austria, Brazil, Cyprus, England and Wales, France, Georgia, Israel, Italy, Northern Ireland, Peru, Scotland, Slovenia, Sweden, and the USA displayed substantial excess age-standardized mortality of varying duration during 2020, while Australia, Denmark, Estonia, Mauritius, Norway, and Ukraine did not. In sex-specific analyses, excess mortality was higher in males than females, except for Slovenia (higher in females) and Cyprus (similar in both sexes). Lastly, for most countries substantial excess mortality was only detectable (Austria, Cyprus, Israel, and Slovenia) or was higher (Brazil, England and Wales, France, Georgia, Italy, Northern Ireland, Sweden, Peru and the USA) in the oldest age group investigated. Peru demonstrated substantial excess mortality even in the <45 age group. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights that excess all-cause mortality during 2020 is context dependent, with specific countries, sex- and age-groups being most affected. As the pandemic continues, tracking excess mortality is important to accurately estimate the true toll of COVID-19, while at the same time investigating the effects of changing contexts, different variants, testing, quarantine, and vaccination strategies.
ABSTRACT
Various guidelines recommend steroid in only severe COVID-19 patients. But in hospitals steroids are being rampantly used even at the beginning of symptom onset. Some studies indicate starting steroid only in severe and/or patients on mechanical ventilation while some suggest starting in first 5-7 days to stave off cytokine storm. Hence this study was undertaken with the aim to study the relationship between initiation of steroid therapy and clinical outcome in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The data for this study was collected from the medical records of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a tertiary care hospital. Evaluation of relationship between day of initiating steroid therapy and dose with the clinical outcome was done in terms of all-cause mortality, duration of hospital stay, requirement of assisted ventilation, requirement of ICU and requirement of oxygen therapy. Patients were categorized according to the day of initiating steroid after symptom onset or RTPCR or RAT positivity date, whichever was earlier in 4-7 days group, 8-10 days group and 11-14 days group. And according to dose given of methylprednisolone per day in 40 mg and 80 mg groups. All-cause mortality was significantly less in 8-10 days group (25.78%) compared to 4-7 days (38%) and 11-14 days group (39.68%) and significantly less in 40 mg group (26.67%) compared to 80 mg group (38.46%). Starting steroid between 8-10 days and in low dose (40 mg) is more beneficial in terms of all-cause mortality.Copyright © 2023, Global Research Online. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The World Health Organization declared coronavirus infectious disease-2019 (COVID-19) linked to the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2), a global pandemic in March 2020. The pandemic outbreak has led to the most unprecedented and catastrophic loss of human life in the recent history. As of January 2021, there were more than 100 million cases of COVID-19 and more than two million deaths worldwide. Compared to the general population, patients with cancer are at a higher risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19. In large cohort studies, mortality from COVID-19 in patients with cancer can be as high as 40%. In addition to clinical variables (older age, male sex, and co-morbidities) that are associated with mortality in general population, cancer patients are uniquely vulnerable to severe COVID-19 due to immunosuppression from cancer and its therapy, and disruption of routine clinical care. Among patients with cancer, the lung cancer population is at a higher risk of poor outcomes and mortality from COVID-19 for several reasons. For instance, lung is the main target organ in COVID-19 that can lead to respiratory failure, patients with lung cancer have baseline poor lung function from chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and smoking. In addition, some of the lung cancer treatment side-effects like pneumonitis, may obscure the diagnosis of COVID-19. In this article, we systematically review the most impactful cohort studies published to date in patients with cancer and COVID-19. We describe the rates of mortality in patients with cancer and COVID-19 with a special focus on the lung cancer population. We also summarize the factors associated with poor outcomes and mortality in patients with lung cancer and COVID-19.Copyright © The Author(s) 2021.
ABSTRACT
Intro: Dysregulated inflammation plays a key role in the development of severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. One of the key cellular signaling pathway involved in the inflammatory response is JAK/STAT signaling. Among the hospitalized Covid patients with hypoxia to reduce the progression to ARDS, immunomodulators have a definite role. Baricitinib is an oral selective Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory properties. This study evaluates the efficacy and all-cause mortality among moderate to severe Covid patients who received Baricitinib. Method(s): A retrospective case-control study was carried out among moderate to severe Covid patients who had received Baricitinib. COVID severity matched group from the same time period was selected as the control. We evaluated the efficacy (based on WHO-ordinal scale) and difference in all-cause mortality among case and control groups. Baseline characteristics and outcome variables were retrospectively captured from the hospital health information system. Finding(s): During our study period, 2547 active Covid patients have admitted, out of which 105 patients received Baricitinib. Based on the retrospective analysis 75 patients were selected as the case group and 75 covidpositive patients of similar age and sex were identified by a simple random selection technique to serve as a control group. The age group of the baricitinib group 60.82 (+/- 13) and the Control group 62.34 (+/-13). Among the participants, 62.66% were severe (58% Baricitinib group & 66% control), 36% were with moderate severity (40% Baricitinib group & 33.33% control). The all-cause mortality of cohort was 43% (n=64), 36% (n=27) of cases as compared to 49.3% (n=37) of control group, (P Value= 0.06). Improvement in WOS score by at least 1-point cases 47% and 37.3 % in controls, (P Value= 0.09). Conclusion(s): Baricitinib when combined with standard of care, among hospitalized patients with moderate to severe Covid infection, showed a trend towards clinical improvement and decreased all-cause mortality.Copyright © 2023